A vote on changing the city charter in Auburn will not take place until 2009.
The Auburn City Council voted last Thursday night to delay taking action on the controversial issue until another work session could be held.
Council member Dorissa Shackelford made the motion after several typing mistakes in the proposed new charter were pointed out.
“I think we need to meet on a Saturday and go paragraph by paragraph,” Shackelford said. “If we do it at a regular work session and start at 7, I don’t think there will be enough time. I think we should do this after the holidays.”
The council then voted unanimously to postpone any action on possibly altering the charter until the unscheduled work session can be held.
The next public hearing, set for Dec. 18, has been cancelled.
Several citizens spoke during Thursday’s public hearing on the proposed charter changes, some in opposition to the idea.
While some of the changes are mostly cosmetic, the main focus has been a proposal to allow the city to issue bonded debt without first having a vote of Auburn citizens.
That charter language limiting the town’s ability to issue debt was added in 1998.
City attorney Jack Wilson, speaking at last week’s council meeting, said that in 1998, there was not a downtown development authority.
Wilson said there is a need for revitalization in the downtown area, a move the town’s new DDA could undertake.
Wilson said obtaining bonds could be a method to fund this downtown project.
OPPOSED
Paul Brown, who led a review committee and is president of Citizens for a Better Auburn, first spoke about several wording issues and typing mistakes throughout the proposed charter.
Brown then said he was opposed to removing the section of he current charter that prohibits issuing bond debt without a referendum.
He said the mayor is sworn to support and defend the charter and asked Linda Belchinger to carry out her sworn duty as mayor. Brown later questioned Belchinger on being head of the DDA while being mayor, seeking input as to whether this violating the current city charter.
“How can you be chairman of an authority and mayor,” Brown asked?
City attorney Wilson said it did not violate the city charter for the mayor to serve in both roles.
Barrow County District 5 commissioner Billy Parks, an Auburn resident, spoke in favor of the council being able to issue bonds.
“It is hard to operate without being able to incur debt,” Parks said.
All others who spoke were against the proposal.
Of particular importance is the striking (elimination) of the Municipal Debts referendum clause and the Municipal Utilities clause (approved via a 9/19/98 referendum) by holding two public hearings rather than a referendum. The current wording of the charter is, "(c) The powers of the governing body of this city shall be limited in that any powers enumerated in subsections (c)(A)--(C) of this section must be placed on a referendum and approved by a two-thirds majority of those voting." The stricken wording would be replaced by, "A proposed change to..." of those voting "prior to council taking action."
Eliminating the Municipal Debts referendum clause from our charter gives this and future city councils carte blanche to approve the issuance of bonds to carry out any project, program or venture they so desire without input or approval from citizens except via two public hearings. What vehicle contained within this charter, lacking the ability to require a referendum, will prevent any council from eliminating the Powers and Construction section of our charter (or any section of the charter) altogether via two public hearings?
Further the addition of the Powers and Duties of the City Administrator section to our city charter and its wording defeats the purpose of hiring a city administrator. Read the job description of a City Administrator on the Georgia Municipal Association web site, http://www.gmanet.com/JobDescriptions.aspx. Read the proposed job description of the new Auburn City Administrator on the unofficial Auburn web site and you will find he lacks teeth in hiring and firing of department heads and is named as Chief Executive Officer of Auburn rather than our elected mayor.
A city exists to serve its citizens; citizens do not exist to serve a city. Contact our State Legislator, Terry England englandhomeport2@alltel.net, and object to these changes in our charter or lose your voice in city government. Contact the mayor and city council to object to these changes. Don't expect a reply except from Councilwoman Sally Brown.
Auburn has this ugly gash through the city called railroad tracks. The only businesses to survive long-term on the city hall side of the tracks are a hair salon, a print shop, a couple of other businesses, and a couple of businesses that don't depend upon heavy foot traffic and parking to survive (manufacturing). Other attempts to operate a business on the city hall side of the tracks have failed. The latest casualty is a restaurant. The businesses along Hwy 29 consist of small specialty shop centers and individual businesses, the exception being Ingles Shopping Center. Except for food, not exactly the make-up of businesses attracting foot traffic generating large sales tax input that successful cities enjoy.
The opening of Highway 316 years ago sealed the fate of Auburn to remain a bedroom community. Gone is the traffic Auburn once enjoyed when the Bulldogs played in Athens. The traffic traveling to Winder and Athens is for all practical purposes, gone. Auburn Station will not generate the traffic needed to sustain high-end business investment. Unless Hwy-324 becomes a four-lane highway and is extended to Highway 316, major shopping malls won't consider investing capital dollars.
I applaud the formation of the Downtown Development Authority and its goal. The question arising is, do we want to change our city charter to authorize this authority to issue bonds (taxes, should the bonds not bear fruit) given the history of businesses operating on the "wrong side of the tracks, without a referendum"? Do we want this or any city council or authority to rush decisions so quickly when a referendum would allow citizens the voice to determine the future of Auburn?
Auburn exists today because of the referendum of 1998 to save the city charter. Citizens spoke then to save Auburn and placed language within the city charter to prevent out of control spending by council to the point of eliminating the police department. Calling for a referendum within the charter was the one vehicle inserted to prevent history being repeating.
Citizens, as history has proved, don't begin to become involved or yell until the impact of decisions by any elected official group impacts their individual quality of life via tax increases. One need look no further than the quandary faced by the Barrow County Commission, and cities in Barrow and various other counties, due to poor decisions affecting all taxpayers.
As a taxpayer, If you don't become involved in your city government to provide direction, what restraint prevents elected officials from ignoring the few citizens involved who complain? The requirement to hold a referendum is our only real tool to keep officials in check. Use your voice or lose it! Call Auburn City Hall and tell our employees that you object to this charter change.