After several years of being in denial, the Auburn City Council is finally dealing with its financial shortfalls. The city had built up a large reserve fund during the boom years, but for the last four years, has been dipping into those reserves to make ends meet. Now those reserves are running low and the city has little choice but to stem the flow of red ink. It cannot continue to spend more money than it takes in.
But is this year’s action enough?
Maybe not.
For one thing, the cuts aren’t quite as steep as they first appear. The city moved its cost of managing the town’s water department out of the general fund budget and into the water fund budget. The town then raised its water rates to cover that cost. All of that makes sense, but the city really didn’t get rid of $200,000 in expenses, it just accounted for it differently and raised rates to generate more revenue to cover those costs. Second, the city kept its ill-advised city bus system in place. The ANT transit budget is a work of fiction; there is no way it will generate $38,000 in rider income during the next year. That transit program was created to help a private firm get tax credits to build a large apartment complex in Auburn.
And the city is counting on that to happen next year. The budget estimates those apartments will generate over $100,000 in building permit revenue.
But what if that project is delayed? That would throw the town’s budget into chaos, both from the lack of revenue and the cost of the ANT system.
While those items are “iffy” in the budget, the biggest issue in Auburn’s financial struggles is the cost of the town’s police department. While the city did make some cuts to the police spending, that one department continues to make up half of the town’s total expenses.
That is a formula for disaster. A lot of small towns in Northeast Georgia have gotten into financial trouble because of having police departments that cost too much. No single department in any city should consume half of all spending. That model for a city government simply isn’t sustainable.
To its credit, Auburn is making some other spending cuts in its FY2013 budget. That’s a change from a couple years ago when the council seemed oblivious to the fact that it was spending more money than it was taking in.
But those cuts may not be enough. Until Auburn downsizes its police department to under 35 percent of the town’s spending, it will continue to have financial struggles.
***
The Barrow County Board of Commissioners is planning a tax hike. Well, part of it technically isn’t a hike. The millage rate is going up to offset a further decline in the tax digest, thus the overall difference isn’t a technical increase.
Try telling that to taxpayers. People will pay more taxes on less value this year than last year. For most people, that is an increase even if it doesn’t meet the technical definition.
But in addition to that, the county is also raising the tax rate another mill for what it calls “capital purchases.” That is a tax hike no matter what it’s designated for. In fact, those dollars could be used for anything in the county government and won’t be restricted to capital projects. Capital projects might be the plan, but there is nothing that restricts those extra dollars.
There is no doubt that Barrow County has been ground zero for the collapse in property values. During the boom, those values were wildly inflated as speculation drove up prices to inane levels. Now those values have fallen far below what they were.
All of that has affected local governments. During the good times, governments grew and expanded. Now they are shrinking and the cuts are painful.
The Barrow BOC has made cuts in recent years and now it is raising the tax rate. Maybe the BOC should also take a look at its property tax exemptions — it has a lot —and compare those to other nearby counties.
***
That Walton International is buying up a lot of Barrow County land for what appears to be speculation should get a close look by local government officials. If Walton doesn’t develop that land, some prime real estate in the county could be tied up for years.
The real tragedy of this is that Walton buys the land cheap, syndicates it into small parcels to sell to overseas investors at a very high price, and then pays local taxes on the land at a rate far below what the company is selling it for.
Walton’s plan for its Barrow property is to sit on it for several years then resell. But it has syndicated the land at such a high per acre price, one has to wonder if that property will ever resell at such a high price.
Walton won’t be hurt; it made its money upfront. But the Asian investors may not come out ahead unless local property values skyrocket in the coming years.
Although Walton has billed itself to local officials as developers, many doubt the firm will ever build anything in Barrow County. It may put in a road or an entrance to some of its holdings, but it’s doubtful that Walton will ever carry out the grand plans it shows to local officials.
And government officials shouldn’t be so naïve about what this grand game is all about. It’s about land speculation, not investing in the community.
Mike Buffington is co-publisher of the Barrow Journal. He can be reached at mike@mainstreetnews.com.
Why? Because you need a place to sleep and food to eat. These are the core things you need to make it to tomorrow.
Then what is the core business for the county? According to Ronald Reagan "Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives"
So, Public Safety, Fire and Police would be like your mortgage, you pay for it first... Then look for extra money to pay for the other things in life.
BUT, NOT according to our BOC... They have spent all of the budget on Other things(Beer and Cigarettes) first and are NOW looking for extra MONEY to pay for the county's core business (PROTECT THE PEOPLE).
JUST WANT IS MORE IMPORTANT?
Protecting your property and family or the OTHER things the COUNTY HAS ALREADY SPENT YOUR MONEY ON?
Maybe the BOC should go back to that budget and find some money to pay for the core business expense before they go looking for more BEER money
On top of that, I'm sure you are well aware that we actually have a police department that reaches out to the community instead of treating them like they don't matter. Do they not have the citizens academy? Do they not have a program for teens?
I don't live in the past. The new chief has worked hard to help the community. In your "opinion" you acknowledge he made budget cuts. I challenge you to find another place where a chief not only does that but can keep good people working hard knowing they will not get a raise yet again.
I would really like to know what your problem is with auburn. I have read other opinions you have written, yet i don't see the same tone in your writing about other cities.
I also want to know who would protect us if they did get rid of or cut the police force. The sheriff's department has alot to work and they dont have enough people to be everywhere in the county. Are you willing to risk your safety to help people because we don't have enough cops? I'm not willing to risk my family because someone has a problem with cops, at least ours. I support our cops! I hope your "opinion" of them one day becomes more informed. Maybe one day you will take the time to actually see the things they do to make us feel safe.
You are asking if I would be willing to pay a few extra bucks to keep my family and other people safe. Really? Are you being serious when you ask that? You are sitting there and asking me to put a price tag on not just someones life, but the life of my family? Reality, I 100% agree with you! If they are going to report the news then report the news. If they have an opinion, save it for the opinion page. Having an "opinion" as the first thing seen on the website just shows how much the paper wants to influence the way people think. That is even crazier when you put in there that the person writing doesn't have anything invested in the place that they are writing about.
Mr. Buffington,you are so quick to share what you think about stuff you don't really know about. Why have you not answered my questions about what your problem is with Auburn and with cops and what you get out of attacking a place you don't have anything to do with? If someone doesn't answer your questions you write it like they've got something that they are hiding. Lets hear the truth of it.
Your fear-mongering is typical. I've heard it from a lot of other towns where the cost of a local PD got to be too much. Hoschton got rid of its PD, but there has been no crime wave in that town. Arcade cut its PD back to just two or three people, no crime wave. Pendergrass cut its department down to one or two people, no crime wave. It simply isn't true that when a town cuts its PD that more crime happens.
And yes, there is a price tag on public safety. No community can afford to have everything it wants. There are finite resources to spend and those have to be allocated. I've covered local governments for over three decades and based on that, anytime a city PD consumes 50% or more of a town's budget, it isn't sustainable unless the citizens of that town are willing to pay very high property taxes.
But I ask again, why are you so defensive on this issue?