For more than a year as the chairman of the Barrow County Board of Commissioners, Danny Yearwood has publicly stressed the vital importance of passing the upcoming T-SPLOST referendum. But last week, as the challenger to Sen. Frank Ginn for the District 47 seat in the Georgia Senate, Yearwood dramatically changed his position and publicly renounced the proposed penny sales tax for transportation that will go before voters on July 31. His 180-degree flip-flop took everyone by surprise. Particularly infuriating some folks is his insistence that he never really supported the proposed tax, when he clearly has been its biggest local cheerleader. Tommy Jennings, president of the chamber, said his organization is disappointed by Yearwood’s change in position. The chamber has endorsed the tax measure because of the impact of transportation infrastructure on economic development. “We are disappointed that Chairman Yearwood has made the decision not to support the T-SPLOST, specifically after he was one of the major proponents of the projects that would benefit Barrow County. We continue to believe that safer roads, a bypass around Winder, and the opportunity for economic development will benefit all of Barrow County as we go forward.”
For the full story, see the June 27 issue of the Barrow Journal.


He can't help it, He is/was a Used Car Salesman
Additionally, the T-SPLOST is just FULL of PORK PROJECTS, that Do NOT Improve our Transportation in our area or Metro Atlanta. It is PET PROJECTS all over the Metro, Including in our own backyard, for Example: GOLF CART PATHS in Braselton, Yes those would be Nice, but HAVE NO BUSINESS in a Transportation TAX Package, so NO, I SAY WE ALL VOTE NO
Make the so called LEADERS propose a Real Package of Items WE NEED ONLY, just the NECESSARY ITEMS. The T-SPLOST is JUST TAX #1 of SEVERAL IN THE FUTURE!!!! Vote NO, Ask for a REAL Package We CAN Support!!
http://www.it3.ga.gov/Documents/FinalList/Northeast-FinalInvestmentList.pdf
Our region has nothing to do with Atlanta. We're not even considered as part of the Metro Atlanta area. That's why we are exempt from the Clean Air Scam.
Or after he gets elected?
Obviously the boys in Atlanta punted the tax increase onto the citizens, as they didn't want to be seen voting for a tax increase.
I haven't seen Ginn voting for any tax increases, and I heard him say he wasn't in the legislature when the T-SPLOST was voted on.
“That’s a tax shift from higher income folks to lower income folks,” Ginn said. “I don’t care how you did the math, that would be a tax increase for the folks in the 47th District.
Go on over to the Madison Journal and judge for yourself:
http://www.madisonjournaltoday.com/archives/4795-Ginn-expects-more-talk-on-tax-reform.html
-Alexander Hamilton
I'd rather vote for the Man (Ginn) that stands FOR Something then the Man (Yearwood) changes with the wind of public option.
Anytime anyone confronts your lack of character or morals, just point at the other Guy and scream "Stop Wasteful Spending" or "I'm against any point the other guy made..."
Why it worked so well with Garrison...
After all, we voted against Garrison not for Yearwood.
Really, why would anyone vote for a "Boss Hog" caricature?
Little noticed in the din: $1.08 billion in tax revenue that would go directly to local government, part of the $7.2 billion expected from the proposed 1 percent sales tax.
Each of the region’s counties, cities and towns would get a share of the $1 billion to spend on transportation. But unlike the regional $6 billion fund, there is no requirement to list a single project for the $1 billion local fund. In many cases, voters at the polls July 31 will have no way of knowing where the projects are that the local money would build.
An Atlanta Journal-Constitution survey of all 78 of the region’s city, town and county governments found that more than half don’t even have a project list more than two years after the referendum bill became law.
Of those that have a list, many are not complete. At least 10 refuse to choose projects at all until after the vote passes. One said it would be “presumptuous” to do so. Eight did not respond to questions from the AJC about what they might do with the money.
It’s a stark contrast to the main $6 billion fund. For that list, the law established rigorous guidelines for choosing projects. The proposals were discussed in open meetings and a public vote set. By law, that list is complete. Voters can know what projects they’re choosing in what locations when they go to the polls in six weeks.
Supporters of government transparency are uneasy about the hit-and-miss planning with the local $1 billion.
Ethics watchdogs said they understand the difficulty of planning something big and new, which can be especially hard for a small, understaffed government. But, they cautioned, it matters that voters won’t know how the $1 billion would be spent.
“Any time the public is in the dark it’s a bad thing,” said Randy Barrett, a spokesman for the Center for Public Integrity. If voters could see a list of specific projects before the vote, “then at least the individual citizen can decide whether that use of taxpayer money is worthwhile and going to the right things. Let’s face it, they’re the ones supplying the money.”
It not commerce from private carriers, commercial carriers, its from the federal government. That's right, the big economic boom for the airport is more tax dollars spent to base at the airport.
So, what's the difference, Tax Dollars (Your Money) spent for weekend warriors to practice flying around or giving this lady's husband a pay check for an additional six months?
In other words and please read them s-l-o-w-l-y so your simple mind can understand, the airport deal is an existing tax used for national defense. This SPLOST is a NEW tax one that will be used as a slush fund to pay for pet projects that does nothing good for Barrow County.
air-toys need to locate granite clouds. Preferably with you aboard.
Like the very first poster stated, "he's a used car salesman"...nuff said.
I couldn't vote for Yearwood if he was the only one running. What an embarrasment he has been.
Yearwood never supported the TSPLOST. His job was to be sure that if Barrow County citizens were stuck with the tax, some of the revenue would return to the county. It is a defensive action on behalf of taxpayers in the event the tax passes.
TSPLOST will cost jobs, not create them.
Let's see. Since when does the chairman get a vote unless it is a tie? The vote was not a tie, therefore Yearwood never voted. You can't spin it to make Yearwood look good. Can't happen.
And yes, he has always supported the t-splost.
You have along way to go before the elected arrogance looks anywhere the same to the rest of Barrow as he does in his own head.
DuWayne
DuWayne
DuWayne
Or....The county could give citizens a choice: 1. Toll road funded by users only, or 2. Toll road w/some local funding via a special real estate tax (citizens would get free use of the toll road.
It seems to me, too often we look for someone else to pay for everything we want. A little personal responsibility in handling our needs would be a welcome change in our society.