The Braselton Police Department is looking for a teenager who was initially reported as missing, but is now considered a runaway juvenile.
Ashley Jarrard, 16, last spoke to her family members in Braselton on Saturday, after partying with friends on Friday night, according to assistant police chief Lou Solis. Her family was speaking to Braselton police to file a missing person report when Jarrard briefly called on Saturday night.
Braselton police searched for Jarrard and a 17-year-old friend, Kelsey Mahoney, including tracking their cell phone activity in parts of Barrow and Gwinnett counties and Atlanta, according to Solis.
A Gwinnett County police officer later saw two teenagers matching their descriptions walking along a road. Mahoney surrendered to the officer, but Jarrard ran away, Solis said. A search of the area with law enforcement officers, including the use of a helicopter, didn’t result in finding the teenager.
Solis said her status was changed Tuesday from a missing teenager to a runaway juvenile. At this point, police don’t know her whereabouts, but want to bring her safely home, he added.
Jarrard is 5 feet, 3 inches tall and weighs 125 pounds.
They stay on I-85...But at least they can get out of towners money instead of preying on the locals only... (It should NOT be about money, but unfortunatly it is, just the facts. Some departments leadership is less revenue focused but not here)
Just call a government employee, they have the magic powers to make your life happy and safe.
Drug-courier profiles in many states include automobile drivers who exceed the speed limit, even though a 1991 Federal Highway Administration survey found that more than half of drivers on surveyed roads exceeded posted speed limits.
New Mexico state police invented a drug-courier profile to justify stopping drivers who showed "scrupulous obedience to traffic laws."
The Georgia state police profile instructed state troopers to be wary of "cars carrying a box of tissues, which signals cocaine use, and cars carrying empty McDonald's cartons or pillows and blankets in the back seat, which may signal drug runners in a hurry," as one law journal article noted.
One Florida trial judge observed of the Florida police's courier profile: "When you boil the profile down to its essentials, it covers just about every rental automobile or private automobile with out-of-state license plates traveling north on the turnpike or I-95."
Some police forces use legal technicalities to selectively stop and search cars. The Tinicum, Pennsylvania, police department from 1989 to 1992 routinely stopped blacks and Hispanics driving through or near the town on the pretext of a motor vehicle code provision that prohibits drivers from having rabbits' feet, dice, or air fresheners hanging on the rear-view mirror, and even stopped cars because they had tinted windows. They then searched the automobiles for drugs and contraband. Four black women returning from a church service asserted that the police officer who searched them told them they were stopped because they were young, black, and driving "a nice car."
According to the DEA, federal, state, and local police manage to intercept barely 10 percent of the illicit drugs entering this country. Drug laws have clearly failed to stop people from using drugs - and they have clearly allowed police to greatly increase their arbitrary power over the citizenry. Is all this worthwhile?
Unrestricted power to search implies unlimited subjugation to government officials. Drug-courier profiles symbolize contemporary America's refusal to limit government or protect the individual.
Americans must draw the line and refuse to consent to illegal searches. Judges must stand up for the rights of American citizens against police abuses. This is what our forefathers fought for and died for in 1776, and we should honor their sacrifice. The Constitution says that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated...." The surest way to end abusive drug-courier profiles is to repeal drug laws. When police no longer have a pretext to search every citizen, they will have far fewer pretexts to hassle the people they supposedly serve.
I have been stopped a number of times by LEOs for being in a "known drug area".
My response was "known to who".
They can put signs around schools that say "drug free zone".
Why can't they put signs up that say "known drug area" Stay Away.
Once again, its not about drugs, its about government intrusion and conditioning the people to be submisive to the badge.
I never consent to a search of my person or vehicle.
And I have been subject to harsh and humiliating treatment by over zealous, authority crazed indignant LEOs.
But I will always refuse to consent to unlawful searches...and so should everyone else.
Resist the Police State.
Live free, before its illegal .
Then why don't you post the "facts" as you see them Officer KnowItAll.
My guess is that the facts you present would all be biased in favour of Law Enforcment.
Fact is the war on drugs is a FAILURE.
Anyone who supports the war on drugs is a FAILURE.
Law Enforcement benefits the drug cartels and the drug cartels benefit the law enforcment community.
Wanna buy some guns amigo?
-W
Driving to New York from Miami and only staying for a day. Numerous fast food wrappers could possibly mean you don't want to leave your vehicle unattended for fear of losing whatever it is your carrying. Numerous air fresheners to conceal odor from cops or K9. Driving 45 in a 65. Take ALL of these indicators from the same traffic stop and yes, we would look into th stop a bit further. Watching CSI MIAMI and COPS hardly qualifies you or # 8 to post anything knowledgable on this topic. Especially you, who have never worked in Law Enforcement. There are the facts that he chose to conveniently leave out.
I was stopped by Gwinnett Police once, after I passed him slightly over the speed limit at night, his stop was based on my "not reacting to him" basically, he was looking for DUI drivers, I did pass him but also was briefly distracted for a moment so I didnt see him either. Upon seeing I was not DUI, he promptly, promptly, sent me on my way Without even a verbal warning even, I would say he did his job properly. GOOD JOB. He did NOT attempt to dig out some other excuse for the stop or drum up another reason to ticket me. That was good policework.
Yup only mules do this, no one ever makes a 1 day road trip for buisness or funerals or job interviews.
Problem is the law regulates the many for the actions of the few.
So according to your logic "all people are suspect".
None of what you stated is illegal to do...yet law enforcment labels you a suspect.
So by that logic....You dress and behave like a Nazi SS Storm trooper.
You have a Batman utility belt and storm trooper boots and numerous assault weapons.
Why would anyone think you are there to protect and serve.
History dictates that your types are a government myrmidons devoid of humanity and feelings other than "zero tolerance".
Willing to kill innocents in the name of "duty".
[[Especially you, who have never worked in Law Enforcement]]
I have never been a cattle rancher; but I know bull squeeze when I see it.
-Od