Auburn is one step closer to achieving its goal of being able to offer affordable rental housing to residents who claim the city as their home. At a March 15 meeting, the Auburn City Council heard a request by Brad Smith with TBG Residential real estate firm for the rezoning of an 11.08-acre parcel of land on Mount Moriah Road.
The property, which belongs to Rick and Pamela Wright, is currently designated as agricultural. TBG’s request is to rezone it for Residential Multi Family Apartment to pave way for a proposed 72-unit multi-family community.
City Planner Larry Lucas told the council that the request corresponds with the city’s land-use plan for the parcel and is consistent with the city’s adopted planning policies and initiatives, including the city’s Georgia Initiative for Community Housing objective to achieve quality rental housing. The city’s recommendation is that the council approves the rezoning request. “This not only meets the zoning requirements, but the technical requirements of that zoning classification,” said Lucas.
The proposed development, which would be dubbed Auburn Hills, will include 12 one-bedroom units, 36 two-bedroom units and 24 three-bedroom units, according to Smith. The next step in the plan is for the city to apply to the Georgia Department for Community Affairs on behalf of TBG for $950,000 in tax credits. The zoning approval will fortify their application and give them a better opportunity, said Lucas. The application deadline is in June and the recipients are announced in October, according to Lucas.
Last year, TBG received tax credits for a similar rental development project off Haymon-Morris Road in Bethlehem called Farmington Hills. That development is under construction.
For the full story, pick up a March 21 issue of the Barrow Journal.
This is America.
This Article it written as if Auburn is getting it's very first Apartment building, which is stupid, mr/mrs "staff writer". Auburn ALREADY HAS affordable rental housing so I assume that the Barrow Journal wants to insult every other "affordable housing" owner to kiss the rear of these new comers?
The sentance even sounds ridiculous, as if the the "city has finally reached the pinnacle of housing" and it has now topped out. Who wrote this piece....
I wish that was true, but in Barrow it's not.
Take for example: You purchase land that was used for hunting by a neighbor; does that neighbor have the right to continue poaching on your property because "he been hunting that land long before you brought and he can continue to hunt if he wants. That's the way it's done here in Barrow" -- Lampp and Garison
You want to use your 25 acres for horses, but "new" neighbor moves in and decides they don't want to live next to a barn, so they start filing complaints with the county. Of course because you've pissed off the GOB party members, they start telling you what you can and can't do with your property.
How does that differ from selling property to build low income apartments? It doesn't.
Either you have the right to use / sell your property if you want or you don't.
Offend your "new" neighbors sensibility or refuse to let an "old GOB" neighbor poach you can kiss your property rights goodby.
You might be needing to watch for more than animals to illegally hunt on my proprty or maybe deer that shoot back. You would need permission to hunt my land once I owned it I dont care if you were born on it with a .308 in your hand. Just Saying.
My point is I'm been fighting the county over property rights for years because Jerry Lampp and Doug Garrison told me their friend, my GOB neighbor, had the right to trespass on my property and poach. They were going to "teach me a lesson on how things are done here in Barrow County."
The county issued permits for a house (200,000+), a covered arena (140,000) and an addition on a existing barn, but have changed their minds because as they say, they erred, but we should have know better.
If they got away with this, it would mean that nobody's home, business, building, anything permitted would be safe from destruction by the county changing it's mind.
Can you afford the thousands to protect your property rights?
What will happen now when all those units in Auburn and Bethlehem area fill up, will the citizens aka taxpayers of this county have to pay more to build on to the schools due to overcrowding ? or for the additional police that will be needed due to the influx of people ? Wake up people, this is the start of becomming Gwinnett, Dekalb and other ghetto areas of the state
With a County Government willing to do whatever it takes...
No matter how much it takes...
No matter how long it takes...
Gona run off homeowners making significant improvement in the land.
Why don't you think the next step in their PLAN is to put the population in public housing.
Chase off small business...
Run off homeowners capable and willing to make investment in the county
Put the remainder in their next planed government housing
Hope you like that government cheese
Thanks for your time
Personally, I think we should only allow for residential property to be sold on a minimum 1/2 acre lot with a minimum sq. ft. per house of at least 2,000 sq/ft.
Then Barrow would be the all white Beverly Hills type county smack in the middle of Trailer Park Central, USA. We would finally be able to focus our efforts on the prejudice and hateful concerns of rich white rednecks without having to cater to the social needs of all those pathetically poor conservatives.