The New Year has come and now it’s time to focus on what’s ahead for Barrow County. The coming year has the potential to be a major turning point in the community as several major elections will take place and new leaders will take the helm.
So what should Barrow citizens look for in 2012?
Here are some of our top goals for the coming year:
• To see citizens elect a competent and visionary leader as chairman of the Barrow County Board of Commissioners. This is vital in 2012 because the next chairman of the BOC will be the guiding voice in 2013 as the county moves away from a fulltime, strong chairman government to a county manager government. Electing the right person in 2012 will be critical because without a strong chairman leading the transition, that process could turn into a disaster. It is critical that the right kind of leader gets elected this year to the chairman’s seat.
• To see a more open government in the City of Winder. After four years of secrecy and duplicity, a new mayor has taken the helm in Winder. David Maynard promises to open up the city government for more council and citizen participation. That will be a good move for Winder. Related to that, Winder leaders should take a close look at how the city currently organizes its finances and auditing. The current system is too complex; because the city is so heavily dependent on utility income, it’s often impossible to really know how the town’s government is doing financially. The town’s General Fund balance is, for example, not very informative since the city keeps most of its reserves in its utility accounts. A clearer system of financial reporting should be explored so that both city leaders and citizens fully understand where the town stands financially both in its general government operations and in its utility operations.
• To see a major improvement in key test scores in the Barrow County School System. That is especially important in the system’s Math scores, which lag most other area school systems. The BCSS has the potential to be a much stronger system, but has for too many years been content with mediocrity. In 2012, the system should strive for excellence and set a new tone for the future.
• To see some stability in the county’s fire and EMS services after too many years of turmoil. Some of that turmoil may be due to the system’s structure, which seems to be designed more for a big city department than a department in a suburban/rural area. But in addition to that there have been a series of problems caused by personnel conflicts and incompetence. County leaders need to get a handle on all these public safety problems.
• To see continued efforts to address the county’s very large drug abuse problems. The county now has the best overall law enforcement leadership in its history and those leaders have begun to crack down on crime in a way the community has never seen. But law enforcement alone can’t reduce drug abuse; it will take the support of the courts, schools and private citizens to bring the kind of pressure needed to slow down the local drug culture.
There are other issues in the county, but these are the most important we see coming in 2012. And all of them require strong leadership.
Mike Buffington is co-publisher of the Barrow Journal. He can be reached at mike@mainstreetnews.com.
I take great pride in my profession, and my department. I to desire "to see some stability in the county’s fire and EMS services" It has been "too many years of turmoil". However I strongly disagree with you as to pointing the blame for said "turmoil", as s "system’s structure" issue. I also adamantly differ with your inference that the makeup of this department is that of one which is structured to provide emergency service for a "big city department ".
"Turmoil" Chiefs: Post, Melvin, Skinner, O'Brien (refused offer ), Towns, Skinner (again!), and currently now Merrifield. You need a score card yet?. Assistant/Deputy Chiefs: Melvin, Wise, Bullock, , now batting...Skinner! Can anyone else read between the lines? I do agree with you again on the point of "multiple problems", however from my seat the genesis of the "conflicts" were not solely seated within our organization. Our issues were caused by personnel and incompetence (your words not mine), but the blame should not fall solely upon the department or its leadership. County leadership and the economic state of the county/state have created a revolving door of not only the leadership but general staff, for the Barrow County Fire and Emergency Services, now Barrow County Emergency Services...What, or who will we be next week, I venture to guess; not?
"System’s structure" You refer to Barrow as a "suburban/rural" area, to some degree you are right. However, many within the fire services, and others see Barrow for what it will be, and in some cases already has become. Barrow County is a county within the cusp of the greater Atlanta metropolitan area that is rapidly evaporating its rural pedigree. We as a department are struggling to meet the needs of a growing and diverse population (currently with a population of 69,367, population percent change between 2000 to 2010 of 50.3% [US Census] ). 2011 saw for the first time the department exceed 8000 total emergency responses. These figures equal to or exceeding many "big city departments" with similar populations/call volumes, The only difference is we provide services for an area of 162.3 sq/miles, not 20 or 30 city blocks. Most big city fire departments place 15-20 firefighters on the scene of the first alarm of fire. All this within the first 8 to 10 minutes, and supplemental alarms draw both additional resources to the scene and back fill stations. We are lucky to get 7-9 firefighters in twenty and are never afforded the back filling of stations. We as a department operate well below any nationally recognized response standard. So please enlighten yourself to NFPA 1710, "Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations." it all in black and white.
I posse you this question; what is the difference between a house fire in a metropolitan community and one which could/will and has occurred here in Barrow. Nothing! As far as firefighter's size it up, they are both equal. A average tax paying residential 3-4 bedroom home with 2500 to 3000 sq/ft of living space, has the same fire load, both need the same gallons per minute of water to extinguish a given blaze, and both have the same potential for loss of life.
In 2010 The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce conducted a scientifically study on fire department staffing and the effectiveness of crews both at fire scenes and on EMS responses. The numbers do not lie. This study shows for the first time, what we have been saying for decades in the fire services; we are under staffed.
Economics are improving, as evident by the growth we are seeing both with the commercial and housing development around Barrow Crossing, as well as are visible with the construction of the Statham military reserve base and planed infrastructure enhancements which will surrounding the instillation. For the first time, at least form our vantage point, the doom and gloom, of cut slash and pray for a miracle governance should be giving way to responsible planning and growth, This growth should include both augmentation and improvements to all public safety programs. Programs long overlooked and/or slashed, much in need of updates modernizations and investments toward the county's future. With cooperation of vested parties, a structured and sound foundation for Barrows future is obtainable which shall yield dividends.
However, I fear without buy-in from all parties and constructive collaboration, we here in Barrow shall live up to our meaning: "barrow": (English) "a large mound of earth and or stones placed over a burial site"
Or we can follow a road less traveled...
"Happy Days will be here again... " We can choose to remove ourselves from this political boondoggle. For with the the new year, comes new opportunity, "A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward." FDR
When it comes to the timely delivery of EMS, there is no better delivery system that is more cost effective, if it is effectively managed as a business.
No other institution, public or private, has the means of providing pre-hospital emergency response as proficiently and successfully as the fire service. Fire department are geared to swiftly response, whether it is for EMS or fire suppression.
Increased responsibilities and decreasing budgets, have forced our local government and BCES to evaluate and trim the current systems. however, Design changes and improvements need to be to evaluated and placed in to action to better prepare us for the future. case in point, the ambulance in Winder
The quality of publicly funded fire-based EMS is in second to none. Fire based EMS is good for the public good. From both the perspective of cost and speed of delivery. Response times .are optimized by the positioning of station in the neighborhoods, rather than from a centralized EMS station. As a result defibrillation and other life saving care is delivered promptly.
Communications, equipment and other EMS items which would require duplication if EMS was emergency services were segmented into multiple agencies are not needed, thus it is a cost savings.
Privatization of EMS is a slippery slope. Generally the low ball initial contracts, then once all local EMS resources are sold off or mothballed the cost skyrockets... A practice which AMR and other private EMS providers are well known for... Also the Borg, assimilation method of buying up all the mom and pops in the industry failed, just ask AMR how the biggest and best strong arm tactics worked for them in the last ten years Determining the needs of the community should be done by those in the community. Not those in a executive chair five states away.
The AHA's "Chain of Survival" is dependent on early .CPR and defibrillation. Both are available already from the fire services as well as a means to deliver community based education to the public. The networks of delivering these programs in many areas are not only in place, but in practice. However I will admit there is room for improvements to our outreach programs.
Dispatch and communications are seem less when utilizing a singular point of contact and dispatch. A third service EMS agency, with its own dispatch will slow down the delivery of EMS care, and has potential to hinder the transfer of information.
Staffing, the current delivery model for fire suppression is dependent on having cross trained firefighters who predominately deliver EMS (80% of total call volume) without them the cost of fife protection will increase. The ISO rating will increase as will insurance rates. Additionally the cost of additional staffing will mount. to replace those positions lost.
Job Performance and Safety: Many times in the course of performing emergency response and patient care, the need arises to be able to render care in hazardous environments. This can only be none by providers how are cross trained. In many situations where this is required when EMS is not fire based, a delay in treatment is encountered.
Continuity of Care, this may not seem like a major issue, but ask a patient that has been handed off several times by multiple providers. Also there is information that is lost each time it is transferred. Doctors can provide better information with clear and concise information delivered from first hand knowledge.
For all the above reasons fire based EMS is cost effective System review and evaluation must be ongoing...
The money pit in ems work is transport units, personnel and equipment. The life saving part is what the fire dept. does best.Plus it keeps the highly trained paramedics with their equipmet in service in their response areas longer,instead of being tied up at the hospital and on the road transporting for 2& 1/2 to 3 hours per call.