Newspaper reporters can be a pain in the ass. I admit it. We’re a bunch of nosey people who ask questions, dig through documents and generally pester the stew out of public officials.
We realize many officials don’t like that, but we see it as our job. Rather than take the “official” government view as gospel, we ask “why?” Sometimes we say, “prove it.”
For many years, nobody was asking “why” in Barrow County. That deficit of local reporting led us to launch the Barrow Journal in October 2008. The community was starving for information.
Last week, the aggressive reporting of Barrow Journal reporter Susan Norman saved Barrow citizens from what would have been a major tax hike of nearly $2 million. Instead, because Susan prodded and pestered local officials and recalculated official data herself, the tax rate will likely go up only ½ mills rather than two mills; and with lower property values, most taxpayers won’t see any increase in their taxes.
Such an outcome doesn’t happen very often in the newspaper business. More often, the coverage of local government news and its impact is subtle.
So what happened last week is unusual. Susan Norman is a very experienced reporter. She’s worked for a number of newspapers over the years in Georgia and elsewhere. In fact, she worked for this company in the 1970s while a college student.
That depth of experience gives her a unique perspective that can’t be found at most newspapers. She’s seen just about every flavor of government problems possible. Public officials can’t bamboozle her; she’s heard it all.
And Susan is a little unique in the fact that she not only understands the government budget process, she actually likes digging into the numbers. Most reporters shy away from that. Government budgets are extremely complex. It takes a lot of experience and patience to analyze government financial data.
Susan called me early last week and said there seemed to be something wrong with the projected revenue in the Barrow County budget. She had asked for more details and she had communicated with at least three county officials about the situation. In fact, she asked about one aspect of the data at last Monday’s board meeting, a question that nobody at that time could answer.
At 4:30 a.m. last Wednesday morning, Susan was e-mailing county officials about a specific discrepancy in the data. By Thursday evening, she had found the mathematical error. She did that by digging deeper into the data — actually getting copies of detailed county spreadsheets and doing her own calculations. (There’s a clear trail of e-mails between Susan and county officials that show how all this happened.)
That financial data is much more complex than it may seem. It’s easy to make an error because it’s a very convoluted process.
Based on Susan’s recalculations and questions, a group of officials met Friday to go over the information and discovered that indeed, an error had been made. Susan’s re-calculations were right and the county’s data was wrong.
So instead of raising taxes nearly 2-mills to meet the FY2012 budget, only a ½ mill increase would be necessary. The board acted this week on that new information.
I realize some public officials in Barrow County consider the Journal to be too controversial. We’ve reported stories that had remained buried for years. We talk about local issues that are “sensitive.” We give our readers data that in the past, Barrow citizens never had access to.
This is what good newspapers do. Most public officials want to do the right thing. But all too often, they get blinded by the job they were elected to do. They bow to pressure from friends or political allies. They posture for re-election. They find themselves out of their depth on some issues for which they have little background.
And sometimes, officials just make mistakes.
Some Barrow officials are loath to give Susan credit for finding the error in the county budget last week. They told another newspaper that previous calculations had been based on a “worst case scenario.”
And some citizens are concocting wild conspiracy theories about the issue; that somehow it was a plot to deceive taxpayers.
But the truth is, county officials made a mistake in the data and nobody caught it until Susan pointed it out. No conspiracy, no “worst case scenario.”
By having an aggressive newspaper asking questions and not making any assumptions, a community is better served in the long run whether it’s county budgets, or any other public issue.
Yes, I know Susan and her colleagues can be pests. They call officials at home late at night. They ask questions in what sometimes appears to be a confrontational tone. They file open records requests for documents that may seem obscure or unimportant.
Sometimes nothing comes of all that effort. The road to publication is littered with stories that were never written.
But sometimes, as happened last week, the persistent asking of questions makes a big difference.
Barrow taxpayers were saved $2 million in taxes this fall because nosey Journal reporter Susan Norman did her homework and asked questions.
You can thank her at:
snorman@barrowjournal.com.
Mike Buffington is co-publisher of the Barrow Journal. He can be reached at mike@mainstreetnews.com.
O
I am glad we have competition in this town. Its healthy and hopefully will force BOTH papers to work hard to produce excellence in journalism.
My father was a tax collector for many years. Yes, the press can be a pain in the butt. He never answered the phone when they called. But, he was also honest and made sure the books added up...painfully meticulous before computers and QuickBooks came on the scene. He viewed keeping the books correctly as his civic job and not talking to the press a way to avoid those expensive high blood pressure meds!
Keep up the good work Barrow Journal!
Why? both were communtiy organizers.
dead Hitler (still) has a stronger work ethic than a live Obama.
Being dead; Hitler is (still)not as incompetent as a live Obama.
also a dead Hitler does not make campaign speeches every 3 days.
Riiight.
He was up at the crack of noon, then had to take a shot of dope to get going.
On D-day, when the military desperately needed the reserve units, Hitler was asleep.
And, Hitler was competent?
One reason Allied intelligent was opposed to assassinating him was that his military bungling aided the war effort.
Now, do you have any more tea-tard brilliance to display?
I wrote "has" present tense.
I forgot that the mentaly dysfunctional liberal brain does not understand sarcasm.
But hey thanks for playing.
(snicker)
Have you ever heard of the apostrophe?
liberals [sic]
Spelling is also not your game, either
mentaly [sic]
Go back to reading Mein Kampf.
Do you guys realize what a big deal this really is? A newspaper reporter found a mistake that saved Barrow taxpayers $2 million. This type thing never happens, or at least hasn't in my 30-plus years with CPAs, financial managers and other number crunchers.
And the fact is, this error would have never been discovered down the road. The unexpected windfall would have been attributed to any number of plausible reasons. Even if a county official had caught the mistake later on I can guarantee it would have been deep-sized. Nobody is going to own up to this size mistake.
The reporter and the Journal both deserve honors because they truly saved the day- no, the YEAR - for all BC taxpayers.