The county’s budget process for fiscal year 2012 hit an unexpected roadblock Tuesday night when the Barrow County Board of Commissioners voted 4-3 to postpone a request by its chief financial officer to set a tentative property tax rate.
Rose Kisaalita said in order to cover a projected $2.9 million revenue shortfall in the fiscal year starting Oct. 1, the property tax rate would need to rise by 1.92 mills. That would take the millage rate to 12.258 mills, which would be an increase of 18.4 percent over the current rate of 10.338 mills.
Kissalita asked the board to set a tentative rate so that she could meet the state’s legal requirements for advertising and public hearings prior to adopting the final rate.
“I tell you the budget committee has really, really worked hard, but I think the budget committee is done,” she said. “It is now up in your hands, and we need to make the hard decisions.”
Commissioner Steve Worley, who navigated the budget committee through most of the spending cuts it found over the summer, made the motion to set a tentative rate hike of 1.92 mills. Commissioner Billy Parks, who attended nearly all of the budget committee’s meetings, seconded Worley’s motion.
However, BOC Chairman Danny Yearwood said he didn’t think the BOC was legally required to set a tentative rate increase at this point. He said if the tentative rate changed over the next several weeks, the county would have to start its public process all over again.
Worley, Parks and Commissioner Eva Elder voted to tentatively raise the millage rate by 1.92 mills.
But the other three commissioners – including Larry Joe Wilburn and Isaiah Berry who had served on the budget committee – voted against the rate hike.
Commissioner Ben Hendrix, who did not attend any of the budget committee’s meetings, also voted against the hike.
Yearwood broke the 3-3 tie with a fourth “no” vote.
For the full story, see the Aug. 24 issue of the Barrow Journal.


"We have had to take so much awayfrom our employees and it saddens me that our economics are in such dire straits that we had not(sic) choice. I truly appreciate the employees that are still here.
I know employees have the right to be angry and they may need to vent their anger, however I would like to remind everyone that on June 15,2009 we laid off 18 fellow employees and I am sure that any one them would appreciate the chance to come back to work so they may have the opportunity towork toward retirement, be provided with insurance options, accrue paid time off and still receive a pay check.We are all experiencinghard times financially and we can all be thankful that we do have a job.
Attached is a letter that you may feel free to use whenever an employess threatens to quit or whenever they are becoming a moral(sic)buster in your department. We must work together during these tough times and we must do everything within our power to instill positive attitudes."
The attached letter read like this here.
" Please accept this letter as my official resignation regarding my employment with Barrow County.I am upset with the recent decesion to reduce my salary; therefore I am making the decesion to resign."
This was all done on County letterhead and copied to each district commisioner and all department heads. Make of it what you will, there are no doubt some who will read this and see no problem, but Im just not one of them.I think that if your elected official takes pleasure in rubbing salt into the wounds of his employees that he is really not in the game for leading them or the populace.
get a leg up in 2012.
At least he took action, which is more than I can say for the previous Chairman.
I don't think he was "rubbing salt" as Jack said. It was straightforward and to the point.
It is a very difficult situation but it is NOT Yearwood's fault....If anyone is to blame it would be Garrison and his "zoo crew"
While I agree that Yearwood is not the man for the job, I think a memo from 2009 is a LAME argument!
A county sales tax or some other mechanism is OK, but taxing me on the home and property I own with the ability to seize and sell my home if I am delinquent is not right! Never has been and never will be.
It's time we start a serious conversation about combining Winder and Barrow county government. It would save us MILLIONS!
You're probably a moocher who doesn't pay a dime to begin with. One thin dime of an increase is too much. In fact the entire concept of ad valorem is rotten to the core.
"Each individual of the society has a right to be protected by it in the enjoyment of his life, liberty, and property, according to standing laws. He is obliged, consequently, to contribute his share to the expense of this protection; and to give his personal service, or an equivalent, when necessary. But no part of the property of any individual can, with justice, be taken from him, or applied to public uses, without his own consent, or that of the representative body of the people. In fine, the people of this commonwealth are not controllable by any other laws than those to which their constitutional representative body have given their consent."
John Adams, Thoughts on Government, 1776
I call bullshit on the entire board!