Milton man arrested in latest online sting

Did you really type this statement "but how about we put this police effort into reducing crime in our own county instead of trying to police the whole state"

He was coming to this county to HAVE SEX WITH A 14 YEAR OLD GIRL, who lives in this county. What do you think we should do, let them have sex then arrest him when he leaves the bedroom. As far as the investigation goes, we dont know where they are from until they want to set the meeting up...dont try and post things you know nothing about,,, so yes this post is VERY umpopular.

Who are you talking too CaptianObvious?

"Sometime police like create crime, it's job security"
Thats what we call entrapment, sorry better things to do then " create crime" plenty of that out there already. As far as them coming to meet an adult female, well then they wouldnt come. That actually get in the chartroom where there are young girls. And the police do not start the conversation, they wait on someone to talk to them,therefore not entrapment. We don't make them get in the car and drive two hours to meet the young girl, we are just waiting on them when they get here

"this is stupid" just FYI a crime is already committed before they even get here. 90percent of the time they do sexual acts over the computer thinking it's a 14 yoa girl.....learn the law before you post.

Ok smart one, yes you Odins Eye, who will apparently question everything outside your little bubble world..are the"gods" ready.......


(1) 'Child' means any person under the age of 16 years.

(2) 'Identifiable child' means a person:

(A) Who was a child at the time the visual depiction was created, adapted, or modified or whose image as a child was used in creating, adapting, or modifying the visual depiction; and

(B) Who is recognizable as an actual person by the persońs face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature or by electronic or scientific means as may be available.

The term shall not be construed to require proof of the actual identity of the child.

(3) 'Sadomasochistic abuse' has the same meaning as provided in Code Section 16-12-100.1.

(4) 'Sexual conduct' has the same meaning as provided in Code Section 16-12-100.1.

(5) 'Sexual excitement' has the same meaning as provided in Code Section 16-12-100.1.

(6) 'Sexually explicit nudity' has the same meaning as provided in Code Section 16-12-102.

(7) 'Visual depiction' means any image and includes undeveloped film and video tape and data stored on computer disk or by electronic means which is capable of conversion into a visual image or which has been created, adapted, or modified to show an identifiable child engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

(c)(1) A person commits the offense of computer pornography if such person intentionally or willfully:

(A) Compiles, enters into, or transmits by means of computer;

(B) Makes, prints, publishes, or reproduces by other computerized means;

(C) Causes or allows to be entered into or transmitted by means of computer; or

(D) Buys, sells, receives, exchanges, or disseminates

any notice, statement, or advertisement, or any child́s name, telephone number, place of residence, physical characteristics, or other descriptive or identifying information for the purpose of offering or soliciting sexual conduct of or with an identifiable child or the visual depiction of such conduct.

(2) Any person convicted of violating paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000.00 and by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 20 years.

(d)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person intentionally or willfully to utilize a computer on-line service or Internet service, including but not limited to a local bulletin board service, Internet chat room, e-mail, or on-line messaging service to seduce, solicit, lure, or entice, or attempt to seduce, solicit, lure, or entice a child or another person believed by such person to be a child to commit any illegal act described in Code Section 16-6-2, relating to the offense of sodomy or aggravated sodomy; Code Section 16-6-4, relating to the offense of child molestation or aggravated child molestation; Code Section 16-6-5, relating to the offense of enticing a child for indecent purposes; or Code Section 16-6-8, relating to the offense of public indecency or to engage in any conduct that by its nature is an unlawful sexual offense against a child.

(2) Any person who violates paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 20 years and by a fine of not more than $25,000.00; provided, however, that, if at the time of the offense the victim was 14 or 15 years of age and the defendant was no more than three years older than the victim, then the defendant shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.

(e)(1) A person commits the offense of obscene Internet contact with a child if he or she has contact with someone he or she knows to be a child or with someone he or she believes to be a child via a computer on-line service or Internet service, including but not limited to a local bulletin board service, Internet chat room, e-mail, or on-line messaging service, and the contact involves any matter containing explicit verbal descriptions or narrative accounts of sexually explicit nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse that is intended to arouse or satisfy the sexual desire of either the child or the person, provided that no conviction shall be had for a violation of this subsection on the unsupported testimony of a child.

(2) Any person who violates paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years or by a fine of not more than $10,000.00; provided, however, that, if at the time of the offense the victim was 14 or 15 years of age and the defendant was no more than three years older than the victim, then the defendant shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.

(f)(1) It shall be unlawful for any owner or operator of a computer on-line service, Internet service, or local bulletin board service intentionally or willfully to permit a subscriber to utilize the service to commit a violation of this Code section, knowing that such person intended to utilize such service to violate this Code section. No owner or operator of a public computer on-line service, Internet service, or local bulletin board service shall be held liable on account of any action taken in good faith in providing the aforementioned services.

(2) Any person who violates paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.

(g) The sole fact that an undercover operative or law enforcement officer was involved in the detection and investigation of an offense under this Code section shall not constitute a defense to prosecution under this Code section.

(h) A person is subject to prosecution in this state pursuant to Code Section 17-2-1, relating to jurisdiction over crimes and persons charged with commission of crimes generally, for any conduct made unlawful by this Code section which the person engages in while either within or outside of this state if, by such conduct, the person commits a violation of this Code section which involves a child who resides in this state or another person believed by such person to be a child residing in this state.

(i) Any violation of this Code section shall constitute a separate offense.

Last modified: April 21, 2006
Here is your crime,,,,now please come up with some off the wall response for us all, can't wait...by the way. Still waiting on your response from my last post....what great career do you hold?

Nope, what I am saying is you know NOTHING about this topic or any other topic in this career field other then what you read and see in the media, you know, the same media that you claim to hate. what I am saying is that these perverts have webcams and get on these webcams and do unimaginable acts with people watching, mostly they think are kids. Dont try and post things on a subject you have no knowledge of. You have no clue what type of strong person it takes to work one of these sick cases. Believe or not these sick bastards are our there, you banker, lawyer, doctor, barber and neighbor and yes even officers. Sorry you don't want to see that in the buBble you live in.

Next time the ATF arrests someone for having bomb making material in the trunk of his car, we should just let them go.....until of course they blow the mall up you are shopping in...then we will go get them....people amaze me on their thought process.....

I bet your son is proud to have a mom like you knowing how you feel about law enforcement. You are a sorry excuse for a parent if you have a son in this career and still make comments the way you do. Btw, I am not from winder and trust me , I AM NOT an employee of the paper, and yes I AM a cop, a damn good one too. You may think my comments are unprofessional, mean, or down right rude. I can promise you this, I would never have posted the comments I do if not provoked by sorry subjects like you, OE and any person who post's comments in here who questions,stereotypes, or comments the way you do about police officers. The same police officers who provide the safefy and security to you, your friends and your family. Sorry you don't like my posts, but as long as there are people like you and OE in the world, I will continue to stick up for the career I , as well as your son ( if really a cop)' have given our lives too.

As far as your son " NEVER arresting anyone for only marijuana in his entire career" tells me one of two things, either, A. He is not a cop or B. He is a cop and works behind a desk as a dispatcher because he can't make it on the road. That's a pretty big statement to make which I find very, very hard to believe he has never arrested anyone for that. If he really is a cop, then he as well as you would now that there are certain laws that WE must arrest on, Marijuana possession, especially while driving, we MUST ARREST, OR ISSUE A CITATION. So your son sure does break a lot of rules, or he is one of those officers that give the good ones a bad name like the ones you and OE like to bash so much in here. Of course after reading your post about 80 percent of the cases being dropped leads me to believe you or your son or OE have not a clue about law enforcement however try and sound smarter then you really are. Btw still waiting on your proof on that issue also, surely with your son being a "cop" , he can get with the DA's office and find out the real truth. Most likely wants to be a cop however failed the psych test due to his awesome up bringing in your household. wackenhut security btw, is not law enforcement. You tried though.....let me know when your ready to REALLY DEBATE , I'll be waiting...