The Barrow County Board of Commissioners on Tuesday night decided not to raze the 20-year-old courthouse annex in downtown Winder but instead to remove the mold and to restore the building.
In a pair of votes, the commissioners agreed to invest about $425,300 to replace the building’s badly leaking roof and to remediate the mold problem.
The remediation work will involve tearing out surfaces where mold has grown unchecked since the spring of 2009 when the sheriff and judicial officials moved out.
The judges, district attorney and clerk of Superior Court relocated to the new Barrow County Criminal Justice Center off Barrow Park Drive. The sheriff’s administrative and patrol division offices moved to temporary space in the adjoining downtown courthouse.
After two years of no progress on the renovation of the downtown facilities, Sheriff Jud Smith in January requested that the project move forward. Commissioner Larry Joe Wilburn suggested that the four-story annex be torn down, with the county restoring only the courthouse and instead building a new Sheriff’s Office off Barrow Park Drive.
However, a project committee led by operations development manager Bob Hohe decided last week to recommend the full restoration of the annex along with the courthouse.
On Tuesday night Wilburn joined in the unanimous BOC votes to approve both a $277,612 contract with Sunbelt Builders for the replacement of the annex roof and a $147,680 contract with J.J. Morley Enterprises for mold remediation.
It is unclear exactly how much funding is available for the ambitious restoration project that could include not only the courthouse and annex but also the former jail that adjoins the courthouse via an underground tunnel.
BOC Chairman Danny Yearwood at the May 17 committee meeting pushed for a recommendation about the jail but the panel opted to wait until it becomes clear how much money is available and how much the renovations of the courthouse and annex will cost.
As of January, the county had spent only $130,500 of the more than $3.3 million budgeted for the project out of $58 million in bonds issued in June 2005 for the construction of several facilities.
However, Hohe said last week that the funding for the project could exceed $4 million. He and CFO Rose Kisaalita have been poring over years of records to nail down the funding figure.
Still undecided is exactly how the renovated office space in the courthouse, annex and former jail would be used.
The original plan called for the sheriff’s office to occupy the entire annex, but Smith has asked only for the use of the top two floors of that building.
One commissioner has mentioned the possibility of moving the BOC offices to the historic courthouse and holding future commission meetings in the former Superior Court courtroom.
Hohe said the project committee – comprised of BOC Chairman Danny Yearwood, a few other commissioners and county staff – would soon look at how to program the renovated office space.
The sheriff is not on the committee and has not been personally invited to attend the meetings. However, he attended last week’s meeting and raised concerns about the lack of air conditioning on the second floor of the historic courthouse where 12 of his patrol command members are sharing three temporary offices.
The next committee meeting is at 2 p.m. Wednesday, June 1, in the conference room on the second floor of the county administration building on East Broad Street.
TEAR THE DAMN BUILDING DOWN!!! You are going to raise our property taxes and spend it on mold? What a mis-use of our tax money.
The Funds were already set aside for the Courthouse Repairs, those funds are dedicated for that purpose only as I understand it. Meaning it is not coming out of current operations budget, they can't be diverted as well. The bid does seem low but I think a good bit was appropriated previously for the repairs. (If Taxes are raised, it won't be for this)
If they say it can be done for that price, hold them to it, that was their bid to be awarded the job.
One QUESTION: Even if we have 3 Courthouse buildings (Administration, whatever), THEY ARE ALL COUNTY Buildings, So HOW, HOW could one EVER get in that condition EVER? Even if not in full use, SOMEONE Really dropped the ball here.
We don’t need to tear it down, we need to fix it and then hold someone responsible for maintaining PROPERLY Each and Every County owned property, which means Citizen Taxpayer's owned property, which was trusted to some really Poor Stewards of our interests.