The bills do eventually come due. That’s what both the Barrow County School System and the county government are learning as they face serious shortfalls in their looming FY2012 budgets.
For the Barrow County Board of Commissioners, this isn’t a new topic. For the last two years, the BOC has wrestled with financial problems, some of which were created by previous county leaders, some of this administration’s own making. The county already made cuts in most areas of government, except for public safety.
This year, the BOC faces a $1 million shortfall, requiring a cut of that amount between now and Sept. 30. That’s an almost impossible task.
Next year in FY2012, the gap could be $3 million. Where will the county find that kind of money to cut, especially since some large debt payments are coming due?
Perhaps an even bigger problem, however, sits on the desk of business director Ken Cato at the Barrow County Board of Education office. Without changes, preliminary numbers given to the BOE last week show that the school system would have to use over $9 million of its $10.7 million reserves to balance its FY2012 budget. That would leave the system with virtually no reserves for FY2013 and beyond.
Both the BOC and the BOE are caught in a storm of declining tax income and rising costs. The county tax digest is one factor as the real estate bust continues to lower local property values. School officials are planning now based on an anticipated six percent drop in the digest later this year. That’s on top of digest declines over the past two years — a drop that was over nine percent last year. This affects both the BOC and BOE.
In addition to a shrinking tax digest, the BOE also faces two other revenue issues. First, the federal stimulus money that has been given to local schools for the past two years is now gone. That’s over $1 million the BOE had this year it won’t have next year. (One could argue that the stimulus money was a mistake; it just delayed tough decisions by propping up local schools, but it didn’t fix the problem.)
In addition to the end of stimulus money, local school systems also face declining state funds. How much is unknown, both for the rest of this fiscal year and for next year. State funding has become a crapshoot; nobody seems to know what to expect, making local school budgeting a guessing game.
But the problem here isn’t just declining revenues. Increasing cost is also a factor.
Some of that neither the school system nor the county government can control. Fuel costs, for example, hits both governments hard, yet neither the BOC nor the BOE can set gas prices. But buses and sheriff’s cars have to run. While fuel use can perhaps be tweaked, that really won’t amount to much money in the big picture.
For the school system, an increasing student population is also an uncontrollable factor. More students mean more costs no matter how you slice the data.
What’s not clear in the BOE budget, however, is why the preliminary numbers given to the BOE last week included a pay raise for school personnel of two percent. That’s a hit of an additional $3 million in costs next year.
The system is talking about all kinds of ways to cut expenses, including perhaps modifying to a shorter school year. Given the seriousness of the school systems’ fiscal problems, why would any kind of pay increase be considered in the budget? If anything, the system should be looking at cutting its local supplements, not increasing payroll costs with raises.
The real issue in both the BOC and BOE budgets is the question of whether or not officials will hike the property tax rates this year. For the BOC, that appears more and more likely. But BOE leaders are cool to the idea of a tax hike, especially since the system is already at 18.5 mills.
Before either the county or schools seriously consider tax hikes, they should first fix some problems in how they’re managing the tax digest.
For one thing, the county’s practice of granting tax incentives to industries even when no jobs are being created should be stopped. There is no legitimate reason to give away tax breaks to developers unless that developer is creating new jobs. Barrow has the most inane business tax break system in North Georgia, a system that doesn’t work, but gives away thousands of dollars in tax breaks. It’s time to stop that practice.
Second, the county should review its slew of local tax exemptions to make sure they are balanced and fair. More than most counties, Barrow has adopted a lot of tax exemptions over the years, but nobody seems to know what impact that’s had on the bottom line.
During the real estate boom here, local governments got used to double-digit increases in revenue year after year. The tax digest was exploding and everyone in government thought the good times would never end.
But they have. Barrow County has taken a hard hit economically and local governments are going to have to adapt to that. That means doing things differently. That means making difficult and painful decisions to cut costs.
Unemployment and underemployment rates are high. The local economy is struggling.
Governments are no longer exempt from that reality.
Tough decisions lie ahead over the next six months — the public will be watching.
Mike Buffington is co-publisher of the Barrow Journal. He can be reached at mike@mainstreetnews.com.
I cut and pasted this from Congressman Dennis kuchinic's web site and its from a congressional hearing with Wis. Gov. Scott Walker.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Admits that Stripping Collective Bargaining Rights of Workers “Not a Fiscal Issue” – Does Not Save Taxpayers “Any” Money
Kucinich Proves Political Motivation of Attack on Government Workers
Washington, Apr 14 -
Washington D.C. (April 14, 2011) – Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) today scored an admission from Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker that his decision to strip the rights of public workers to bargain collectively “doesn’t save any” money for the Wisconsin taxpayers.
See video here.
“Your proposal would require unions to hold annual votes to continue representing their own members. Can you please explain to me and members of this committee how much money this provision saves for your state budget?” question Kucinich.
After an unresponsive answer by Governor Walker, Kucinich pressed, “Did you answer the questions? How much money does it save, Governor?”
“It doesn’t save any,” admitted Governor Walker.
Kucinich then requested permission to enter into the record a letter from the State of Wisconsin’s Legislative Fiscal Bureau (page 3 specifically), a nonpartisan state budget agency that confirmed Governor Walker’s efforts had no effect on the state’s budget.
“The Bureau was asked to identify provisions in the Governor’s bill that are non-fiscal; non-fiscal policy items that have no state fiscal effect. This letter confirms the obvious; that Governor Walker’s effort to repeal the rights of state workers is a non-fiscal policy item. No effect on the state budget shortfall,” said Kucinich.
The Chairman of the Committee then took the highly unusual step of reserving the right to object to the document’s the inclusion in the record.
Kucinich concluded by thanking Governor Walker for clarifying the purpose of his attack on workers’ rights.
“The attack on collective bargaining right is a choice, not a budget issue. ...Governor Walker has inadvertently done a public service …and brought this issue to the forefront.”
After the hearing, Kucinich referred to the letter from the Legislative Fiscal Bureau. “My good friend, Chairman Issa, inadvertently exposed the limitations of his key witness, Governor Walker, by refusing to permit into evidence a document that demonstrated that collective bargaining was a non-fiscal issue. Chairman Issa called attention to it and ensured it would get much broader circulation, for which I am very appreciative.”
I know this is long and seeminly off topic, but this proves to me that elected officials of all parties and stripes are crooked as hell and we should watch these people very closely here in Barrow County over the next few months.
1. Charge an "impact fee" to developers. They want to stick alot of matchbox houses together and grow the population, then they need to pay for the increase in infrastructure (roads, public safety, schools)
2. Renters must pay a "county service usage" fee. Why should the homeowner get a tax break then let multi families move in that could care less about the county since they can just pack up and move after abusing it ?
3. Slow residential growth, approach business' to move to the county to add a tax revenue, with out the extra traffic and impact on our system.
4. Non citizens should not be serviced by public safety, utilities etc. This would remove alot of property damage and dui's.
5. Make homes have a min value of $180k, that would mean more taxes for those who could afford it.
6. Conduct a pay scale and pay people realativly what they would make in a govt setting like Barrow on par with other entities (Oconee, Clark etc)
Finally, get rid of the liberals and crybabies in office, either they do their jobs or they are out and quit voting them in because they have been here or lived here
I believe Ms. Twist brought this up when she ran for BOE. She also brought up "shorting the school year" by going to a 4 day week. This would save jobs WITHOUT cuts to teacher/para/bus drivers etc salaries.
Her arguments made sense to me and she had supporting data.
2012 we need to get rid of the BOE members up for re election and get new blood in there.
Mr. Sullivan and Ms. Twiss were two candidates that should have been elected.
1.) Impact fee on developers - Sounds like a grand idea, except for one thing - know any developers doing any business these days? Hmmm? Didn't think so.
2.) County service usage? Wouldn't hurt. Except for the homeowner looking to rent a home that will now prolly go vacant.
3.) Slow residential growth? How about stopped residential growth. I think we're trying to attract businesses now, but businesses want to come to an attractive area to locate. Is Barrow County that attractive?
4.) Non citizens not serviced by public safety? So, if a crime is being committed against a "non-citizen" do the cops just run away and let it happen?
5.) Make homes have a minimum value of $180K? What is this-communism? You can't just assign an arbitrary value to a home.
6.) Pay scale? Our taxes are below those of Oconee, jackson, Gwinnett, and walton, I believe. Why should our pay scales be on par with those other counties?
Some good thoughts, some not so good. Keep it coming.
It's time to make some cut backs on the people who are paid the highest! Start at the top! Do these people really work all the hours they are required? Do they use tax payers time to handle personal business???
It's time to weed out the old & bring in the new who are ready to work and will be productive for the community! I think in some cases one person could be hired to the the jobs of three people now!!!
Maybe with the new laws on illegals here we will many people leaving to go to another state or return home and get the proper paper work to be here??? Just a thought!
A story in the other news paper talks about a current economic project dubbed: Barrow Lee. The JDA approved $10 million in bond funding in an attempt to lure this company to Barrow in exchange for A HALF DOZEN high paying jobs.
With the current budget issues faced by the BOE and BOC are the citizens really ready to support job creation that costs our tax digest $1,666,666 per job!
If this is the baseline of tax abatement for the future of Barrrow County we are out of control!
Using this project as a baseline: if the EDC manages to snare a company that creates 80 jobs it could cost us $133,333,000.
Worse yet they mention this is for an existing company which means there will be a negative impact to the current tax digest.
IF this new $10 million tax incentive is for the company out on highway 316 that got an 8 year tax abatement when they moved here, then expanded and got another 8 year tax abatement, the JDA should be legislatively disolved.
No county in Georgia would ever give a single business entity a 16 year tax incentive except Barrrow.
I don't think the other paper mentioned anything about an abatement, did they? It talks about the state waiving the sales taxes only.
A bond and a tax incentive are two differnt things, aren't they?
The JDA holds title/ownership in the $10 million dollar business investment.
The JDA is tax exempt and this business owner becomes tax exempt. This business won't pay school taxes or county M & O taxes.
If the JDA exempts property currently on the tax rolls they take the tax digest lower or "backwards". Economic development efforts should never cost the taxpayers existing revenue, especially during times when we can least afford it.
JDA bond financing increases the tax burden for the rest of us! FACT.
Perhaps 6 high paying jobs is worth it to you. Sorry, I feel like this business prospect shouldn't be able to skip out on $74,000 in school taxes in the first year of the exemption alone.
How much do you think this will cost the school system over the entire 8 year abatement.
Our JDA has never considered PILOT bonds and they should. Any business that will not provide computers, busses, or other capital expense items (in lieu of taxes) to support education should not be in Barrow County to begin with!
The publisher is correct: "Barrow has the most inane business tax break system in North Georgia."