The Winder Planning Board gave a thumbs down to Winder City Councilman David Maynard’s request to reduce the minimum square footage for a home built within the city limits.
Citing concerns about the local tax base and continued growth in the Barrow County schools during a time when home values and real estate tax revenues are down, the seven-member board voted unanimously Tuesday night against recommending the ordinance change to the Winder City Council, which will likely be considered at the council’s October 5 meeting.
Maynard proposed revising city zoning ordinances to reduce the required minimum heated living space to 1,200 square feet for residential dwellings constructed in the R-1, R-1A, R-1B, TNPD, A-1 and A-2 zones. Currently 1,600 square feet are required in R-1 (low density), R-1A (medium density) and A-1 (agricultural), while 1,400 square feet are required in R-1B (high density), TNPD (Traditional Neighborhood Planned Development) and Z-2 (agricultural) zones.
Maynard did not appear before the planning board Tuesday night.
During the citizen comment period, Winder resident Robert Lanham told the board he was “strongly opposed” to the ordinance change, which would result in “small cracker box houses” being built. He said he lives in a subdivision that is “90-95% built out” and he would “love to have somebody build homes on those (remaining empty) lots,” but he does not want “little bitty, dinky, tiny houses” built on the lots because they would decrease the value of his house and his neighborhood, he said.
Lanham told the board he “sympathizes with the plight of the building industry” and with the board in having to make difficult decisions because he sits on the Barrow County Planning Board. The Barrow County Builder’s Association requested that the county lower minimum new home sizes to 1,375 square feet earlier this year, but the Barrow County Board of Commissioners took no action.
Winder resident Troy Hensley, who is chairman of the city’s Historic Preservation Commission and also serves as a member of Winder’s affordable housing initiative (Georgia Initiative for Community Housing) told the board he is “not as concerned” about minimum square footage as he is that Maynard’s request does not “have a proper in-fill ordinance with it.”
“It’s not about blanket square footage,” Hensley said, “it’s about being architecturally sound and fitting with the neighborhood.”
He also told the board that currently there are 1,300 empty lots in Barrow County already zoned for a minimum house size of 1,200 square feet, which should offer plenty of opportunity for builders who want to construct smaller homes.
Saying he is “absolutely opposed” to the proposed ordinance change, planning board member Jim Neu said, “We have an abundance of starter homes… that’s where we got off track.”
For more on this story, see the September 22 edition of the Barrow Journal or click here to read the full story online when you subscribe to our new e-edition.
We had a big house. We could afford it. We didn't use 3/4s of it 90% of the time.
After becoming empty nesters, we downsized.
Our house is 1800 sq. ft. We still don't use half of it most of the time, BUT I REALLY miss my big house when we have family and guest over. Those extra bedrooms came in handy then.
We build our house, so it has lots of "up grades" which increases the value. From the outside, it looks like a small art-deco style house, but inside, it has the same options as the $500,000+ homes. We build the house for less than $150,000 so it can be done.
IF the builders would build smaller HIGH QUALITY homes than I wouldn't have an issue with the change; BUT builders will build the equivalent of trailers.
Smaller homes yes, Cheaply build smaller homes, NO.
While smaller homes may be what are built they do not need to be "cracker boxes" and I agree with Mr. Hensley's comments about architectural controls. There are hundreds of examples of wide value ranges being successfully integrated into single communities and everyone benefits when this is done.
Barrow and Jackson have lots of work to do on our building codes and adjusting minimum home size is an important part of that work. Both of our communities need a balanced supply of housing that meets the needs of all citizens but emphasis should be placed on quality and energy efficiency, not on space alone.
A reduction in minimum does not automatically impact existing platted subdivisions since specific minimums are often included within the approval of the subdivision. If a specific minimum has been established for a development it can only be changed by a change of conditions for that subdivision.