Those who have been following Barrow County’s financial troubles know that one of the problems is the county’s tax digest has declined due to the housing bust.
A lower tax digest means less property tax revenue, unless county officials raise the millage rate (which they plan to do this fall.) But there’s a more fundamental problem in Barrow County’s tax digest that will require a much longer-term solution than raising taxes. Somehow, Barrow will have to find a way to balance its tax digest with less reliance on residential property and more commercial and industrial.
It’s no secret that Barrow needs more industry in its tax base. Local officials have been saying that for years.
Nearly one-half of Barrow’s tax digest is residential property while only 23 percent is commercial or industrial. And with the residential, Barrow has created a slew of special local exemptions that bring the digest even lower.
In addition, and unlike many other counties, Barrow offers tax breaks to companies even if those firms build a shell building and offer no immediate employment. Such liberal incentives are ill-advised and unnecessary.
In addition, Barrow has never really exploited its connection to I-85 focusing more on Hwy. 316 as its main development corridor. While there is much more road frontage along Hwy. 316 than I-85 in Barrow, the interstate holds a lot more promise for industrial development in the long-term.
Although some think Barrow should relax housing standards to help start the construction industry, that’s a very short-sighted view. As this recession has shown, it’s a mistake for any community to base its economy mainly on construction and housing.
In the long term, Barrow should focus its future on increasing manufacturing jobs with industrial development and to rein in excessive housing as its economic base.
That will take a long time and certainly won’t solve today’s county budget problems. But if Barrow wants to plan for the future, it’s that road its leaders must follow.
The BOC has squandered money on a paper financial game based on easy credit, inflated home / land values, and greed.
Before we can entice businesses into Barrow, we must first develop the infrastructure. The problem; we have no money. We have outstanding bonds that will never be paid off. They are in essence, interest only loans.
Bringing in small businesses that can utilize the current empty store fronts would be a start in the right direction. Small businesses would increase revenues.
Once we get the budget under control, then we could start upgrading the infrastructure.
Yearwood should have been out wining and dining companies and selling our county and not micromanaging the day to day operations.
I read last week about a company moving their business to Oakwood. There is no reason that same company could not have located in Barrow.
The tourism industry at this exit delivers more than $2 million dollars a year in sales taxes directly to Barrow County. The 200 acre retail development planned at this "tourism destination exit" has the potential to add significantly more sales tax dollars to Barrow County.
If we add industrial growth that negatively impacts our existing tourism industry the result is NO FINANCIAL GAIN for the County.
The industrial focus needs to stay on 316.
And I hate to burst your bubble, but we HAVE NO "existing tourism industry". Traffic that comes off that exit either makes a left hand turn spends money in Gwinnett or the make a right hand turn and then an immediate left hand turn into Jackson.
So please explain what "tourist attraction" Barrow has at that exit.
The Barrow EDC is conducting presentations to local officials urging them to reinvest in economic development but nothing has been done to revise our 10 - 15 year old tax abatement program.
So far $50,000 has been spent to hire a professional "fund raiser" to assist the EDC in raising $2.3 million dollars over the next 5 years.
Hopefully one of these local governments will demand a full reporting (a minimum 10 year history) of our tax abatement program before they spend one more penny of our tax dollars on the EDC.
Which businesses got tax abatements and for how many years? How many County & School tax dollars were given away? How much new industrial investment did we get? How many jobs were created and what is the average wage of those jobs? Did the industry & jobs stay in Barrow beyond the tax abatement? How much money was earned in "bond origination fees" and where was this money spent?
We don't need a summary, we need to see the specific details for each "tax abatement" that required a bond issuance.
Until these questions are answered we have no way to determine if there is an adequate return on our dollars invested in economic development.
Hopefully, one of our local governments has the "chittlins" to step up and get the answers...the time is right.