Thursday night's called meeting of the Barrow County Water & Sewerage Authority in Statham was a learning experience for everyone.
The standing-room-only crowd at the Statham Community Center learned of ways their community could develop if the Barber Creek reservoir is expanded to meet the drinking water needs of the county through 2050.
The UGA grad students making the slide-show presentation learned what happens when planners use national best practices in land-use planning but don't first consult with the folks who own the land.
And the members of the water and sewerage authority learned that property owners are not just fond of their houses – only a few existing structures would be affected by the proposed reservoir – but have a multi-generational love of their land that they likely will be willing to fight for.
Stan Coley, chairman of the county authority, last year invited the graduate planning class of a personal friend of his at UGA to develop as a class project a master plan for the development of the land around the proposed Barber Creek Reservoir.
Then last week, Coley sent letters to potentially affected property owners to invite them to hear the masters-level students’ ideas Thursday night.
But the 80 or so people who attended the meeting made it clear – perfectly clear – that while they appreciated the students’ efforts, and that their ideas would be great for a community that wanted to fundamentally change its rural character, the creation of a "new Statham" town center south of the reservoir would not be welcome.
One woman was brought to tears as she talked about the land that had been in her family for generations.
And local attorney Wayne McLocklin questioned the validity of the study that recommended Barber Creek as one of two preferred sites for new reservoirs in Barrow County. He also evoked considerable laughter when he likened asking an engineering company if there would be a need to develop a new project needing more engineering services to going to Brad Akin Ford and asking a salesman if one needed a car.
To read our full coverage of this meeting, pick up the Feb. 17 print edition of the Barrow Journal.
I don’t really know how UGA Professor Jack Crowley’s class in Environmental Design was briefed before they undertook the study, but their presentation left me empty.
They had a large number of computer-generated slides that, while pretty, could not be read from my fifth-row seat. A visual aid should be used to add to the speaker’s presentation, but just about every student spoke to the slides and seemed not to understand that the audience couldn’t read them.
It wasn’t the slides that really bothered me, though. It was the class’s apparent failure to understand their audience. They had done a marvelous job of developing a number of scenarios by which the Statham Reservoir could be expanded and enhanced to resemble Reston, Virginia, perhaps some place in the middle of North Carolina’s Research Triangle, or at worst, Celebration, Florida. My God, do any of these folks understand what “rural” means to those of us who cherish our lifestyle?
They advanced scenarios by which Statham and its nearby watershed lake could be developed into a monstrosity of walking paths, medium and high density residential areas, commercial and manufacturing sites and farmland on which no livestock could be kept lest their manure seep into the expanded reservoir. They gleefully spoke of how growth could expand Statham and it’s reservoir into a delightful little city where one and all would be served by various levels of residential development, lots of little stores (but no big box stores), and because people should live where they work, plenty of manufacturing and industrial capability.
That last comment has some merit. People should move to where the jobs and conveniences are, not to rural parts of the country where their food is grown.
I think it is time for Barrow County to look at the growth it is feeling and to realize that little of that growth has any benefit to Barrow County. People moved here to escape the congestion of metropolitan Atlanta, Gwinnet County and even Athens. But once they got here, they began demanding the conveniences of the cities, such as a gas station convenience store on every corner, lots of chain places to eat, big box stores to flock to in search of bargains, and, lest we forget, a better highway on which to commute and enough water to sprinkle lawns until little rivers form on their way back to Barber’s Creek.
I agree though, contact Wilburn and put his feet to the fire. He can be replaced.
We have been in a battle with the county for over a year. All we want is for our land to be rezoned back to AG; It's flood plain and according to the future use map all of our land lays within the river rural reserve area. BUT according to the county attorney and Yearwood, the maps are misleading. The dark green area shown as rural reserve is really yellow, you just can't see the yellow for all the green (??????).
Start calling your commissioners (I believe "I abstain" Wilburn would be the commissioner for everyone at the meeting.) Let them know you want to maintain the rural character of Barrow County.